Economics of Contempt

This is not going to be one of those posts that bashes S&P’s decision to downgrade the US, but then says that S&P was probably right about America's political system. The left-wing radicals, the "inside" men and other anti-Christian haters will bash S&P for me, but what they going to offer you is a biased look and definitely no insight.

I'll leave the S&P bashing to those bilking the government, from New York finance lawyers on George Soros's payroll to university lecturers who real world experience in poverty, debt and finance is offering "assist" college girls pay off a "bit of debt" that ends up them becoming lap / pole dancers. Fact is people debt and drugs go hand in hand with moral decline, not all drugs are illegal and drugs come in many forms. Spending large and praise are addictive drugs. Obama "feeds" on praise, applause and seems to have available rooms full of cheering brainwashed youth on hand when he needs background noise for one of his many press conferences.

S&P have yet to be proven wrong on assessment and forecast, but have been shown they have made a very embarrassingly blunder on the basic budget numbers, as everyone knows now, they were forced to remove that section from their report, and change their rationale for the downgrade. Yet somehow left would have you believe when S&P make one mistake, all their actions are flaws. Same group of know-it-alls refuse to acknowledge the tens of thousands of mistakes they made. Nor can they offer any clear alternative. All these left wing fanatics offer is constant criticism. Yes, I know I criticise Obama, but the man is so flawed (what Democrats call a colourful character), besides Obama doesn't listen to criticism, he hears only praise and applause. Besides his idea of modest is having a couple of homes with over 1m each. How can you not critise him for been so far out of touch when people can't even afford one home and work 50-80 hours a week.
S&P’s rationale for the downgrade now changed to one based entirely on their political judgement. But this is what most rating agencies do to forecast. If you want know what government is going to do, it is fair assessment to say a Democrat don't change, just like a snake in the grass. The left-wing and Democrats will always feel any ratings agency that doesn't subscribe to their politics is wrong. Like all dictatorial groups, not just Democrats, don't been told they are not effective, they lack direction and lost focus. Worse is when you demonstrate Democrats act in best interest of themselves.

I'll give you some examples of how Democrats don't change their ways. Bill Clinton sexually harassed women as governor and as president. Al Gore sexually harassed women, rarely reported, but his public harassment of some masseuse in a hotel (his mistake is she was a masseuse and not the kind of girl who says she is a massage worker). Soros who dated for five years a Brazilian actress (like she loved him for his charm right?) promised her a New York apartment, while still in bed he slapped and tried to chock her (sound familiar yet?), he told her (they supposed to be making up) he gave the place to some other woman. It not just left in America, how many French socialists lately and in past sexually harassed young women? Or been in relationships that only involve women been given money for sex? Not just woman's issues do Democrats are dismal at. Education, Ted Kennedy was to say, a loud mouth. His favourite was talking loud, often and for as long as he could. His favourite was to bash anyone's ear about education and spending more. He would go on and on about high cost of education. He never lowered it. He never tried stop universities raising fees. He never challenged one institution. His "game" was to protect Democrats putting money into "education" as tax deduction and political tool.

It’s true that the debt limit debate was ridiculous, but not for reasons Obama would have you believe. Obama going on TV to tell the public to harass congress to submit to Obama's will is Stalinist. Obama giving press conferences to select pro-Obama media and having cheering youth on hand is Stalinist. Obama is acting the same as Kim Jong-il or Hugo Charvez or Joseph Stalin.

Obama and the Democrats have always acted like children, that is they let their emotions run when told no. But this is typical of left-wing universities elitists. Obama's on nicotine patches, so really he is worse than a child having a temper tantrum because they been denied sugar candy. Most of the sitting Democrats are rich and richer than Republicans. Obama's wealth comes from phoney book. It is a phoney. A thick dull set of books that really tell you nothing that hasn't been written, perhaps in far less words, in the press or you can eventually find in government archives. If you looking for career advice on been president, that isn't really covered. Obama's relationship with extremely wealthy Democrats who trawl universities looking for "colourful" characters (not skin colour you bigots, but people with certain personality types).

S&P’s assessment is serious, you should take serious interest in how Democrats, not just in Congress, but the senate with its contingent of long term sitting crazy billionaire socialists. True they are going to serve in perpetuity on Earth, but in terms of how long these corrupt Democrats sit, it feels like eternity when you see how much wealth sitting Democrats have accumulated while supposedly on humble government payroll.

Fact is the make up of any government is set to change. The problem isn't with who is coming in, it is what those who have been sitting now for long time been doing. The damage done to USA's economy is constantly and still is been blamed on the Republicans. When Obama come into office, he had what most would consider a green light. Uncontested majority, he could pass bills with ease. He said he had an agenda of hope and change. Just two words, but hope is something the poor live with, change is something all the radicals demand and the poor hope for. Meanwhile Democrats are the richest and gotten richer. Soros made over 1 billion on the economic downgrade in the UK that saw thousands lose thier jobs. Soros claims he feels bad he pass tax at a less rate than his employees, same time he puts the the cent, the most he can into tax deductions and political donations. Don't listen to a Democrat and believe them, look at what they do.

The simple fact is that Obama has done the damage. Unlike Clinton who did all his damage second term. Even some Democrats admit Clinton's first term was due to riding the wave of economic activity from his "predecessor" (don't you love it when Democrats can't say the name of a Republican unless they insulting them). Democrats were almost certainly at the height of their power when Obama come to office. Democrats controlled senate as president G.W. Bush come to end of second term. President doesn't have all the power. No magic wand, no stroke of the pen. It is a Democracy, don't let Democrats sing you a lullaby about land of milk and honey if they had all the power. Fact is they have had 70% control for nearly 30 years and haven't delivered milk that isn't high in sugar or honey tainted with some poison. Welfare is good to those who need it, but what most people need is jobs. Democrats like Al Gore talked of Solar Power and Electric cars. Yet Al Gore got 400 million and put it into Apple. Not solar panels, but iPods and iPhones. Not American jobs, but thousands of jobs in China. At a factory with the highest rate of worker suicide. Al Gore contribution to global issues.

The debt ceiling debate doesn't reflect some sort of secular change in US policy making. The next time there’s a Republican president, Democrats will engage in the same kind of political dirty tricks they done since President Eisenhower. You’d have to be stunningly naive not to believe this. For the most part the media is always silent come election time about how corrupt, inept and wasteful the Democrats are. Simply assuming that every political confrontation represents a change in US politics and policy making is ridiculous, but facing down Obama has been a huge shift. Remember Obama's victory was huge. Not because he is the first non-white, but for turnout of voters and level of expectation.

S&P tries demonstrate that by the time the 2012 elections roll around, it will be too late to act on debt. Please, ignore the left wing intellectuals and hard-core Democrat media. Without meaningfully change that will affect government's long-term solvency is patently only visible to the few. Only few historians seem to remember that in Germany the economic collapse was due to debt, but with that come the occupation of Munich by left wing radicals. That wide spread economic mayhem was caused by the same radicals that pushed government spending beyond means. That these radicals were funded by outside sources. So few see the same things happening again. Unions funding student radicals, Obama himself a radical.

Some lawyer, if he is one, says he knows these S&P guys. Then says not those particular guys, John Chambers or David Beers personally. But says "I know" the rating agencies intimately. Then gives some background story you can't check like once been an in-house lawyer for an investment bank and I had extensive interactions with all three rating agencies. Then goes on to say that S&P analysts aren’t the sharpest tools in the drawer is a massive understatement. Yet he used them. Yet they are the big rich ratings agency listened to by governments and banks. One "finance" lawyer who for all we know is one of many on George Soros's payroll or even once worked for Burnie Madoff and now blogs on fiance while living off his savings because we know banker's lawyers get more in one year than average worker gets in 10 years and banker's lawyers can be trusted right?

Some Obama supporting lawyers say S&P are not smart enough to understand Obama arguments. I kid you not, this is a hard-constraint in their game-plan, constant insult, no substance. Have you heard all of Obama's plans. Have you ever heard how he going to cut debt? You should be aware the collapse of GM and others was due to debt right? GM was paying unions payroll benefits that far exceeded revenue from the sale of cars. Unions will have you believe it was executive bonus. Left-wing university elitists will have you think it was GM was selling "gas guzzlers". GM admits problem was the cars people wanted for the price people wanted to pay was not sustainable. That is right, people didn't want pay what it cost to make the car, let alone the pay for all the extras GM's unions where making in pension fund management, worker's health care insurance and employee bonus payments. This is how the left try to manipulate you into changing your ideas of good and bad. Attack anything a boss does, even when the employees are getting more than 35% of the revenue. Payroll is expected to be around 20% of a companies cost. Remember company has to pay tax, pay for raw materials and pay shareholders. Most big companies also have debt. Left will always try find some spin and leave out the contextual statements as "messy".

Insiders will tell you they personally seen S&P make far more basic mistakes than the one they made in miscalculating the US’s debt-to-GDP ratio. Yet S&P are the big brand agency and they are not. Same insiders who can tell you all these mistakes by S&P in the past are rather odd, because how come they keep using S&P? How comes they claim as bankers they constantly check for financial soundness, when these insiders are the ones who suppose to protecting YOUR deposits somehow these "insiders" didn't warn the big banks were insolvent? How comes not of these insiders who now claim S&P is so unstable didn't warn anyone about the banks been so unstable? I think it would been more important if these New York finance lawyers who "worked" in the industry for so long warned the people about Bernie Madoff, Enron, General Motors, Goldman Sachs and others.

Treasury has no right to be outraged, the people do. Treasury of the nation acting in the interests of a political party.  S&P only mistake was not proofing final draft, a mistake rarely made, but any mistake, even a comma out of place is pounced on by Democrats. Highlighting faults in others while refusing to even acknowledge anything less than resounding praise is common with the left. The left love to judge and hate to be judged by others (unless it is resounding praise).

So to S&P, I say: you have sounded the alarm that few dared in the past to ring.

The answer is go forward, not backwards. The left wants drag world back to the 1800s. Marx stole some quotes, he didn't even found the union movement. He just got good at been a bully and taking credit for others.

Progress should be made in better goods, not cheapest. Local grown food. Balanced budgets, not debt ridden government. Would you loan anyone who can't pay back? Then ask yourself why do BANKS want government to borrow more. Banks don't employ you, they employ those rich New York finances who tell you how bad the Republicans are and how you need vote Democrat. Democrats who borrow money from the banks.

Be a proud Christian, be a proud Patriot. Don't be beguiled into a one-party state under Obama. You think it will not happen. You think if Obama gets in second term he will not seek same as Hugo Chavez an alteration of the constitution to get more power and longer terms and another term. Obama already stated he need lot longer than one term, just for the few promises he actually made in his run up. Don't be fooled by Obama and the Democrats  Obama has actually told you he wants power and needs more time, he just minced words about it. He never talks plain and doesn't give details before he acts.

Amazing how many women suddenly didn't like Sarah Palin because of a few media comments about her cloths. Really a fundamental problem with people when looks more important than brains. You want a leader, not a model running the country. Not that I endorce anyone to run against Obama, but I rather a soccer mum than a university pot head.

Indoctrination in Schools, Even Maths Hijacked by Activists!

Those of us who attended government schools before “social justice” spread through the curriculum like the plague will probably remember maths class working through basic problems.

But according to those who call themselves progressives what we didn’t know it at that time was while we busily pondering combinations, probability and basic times tables that we were actually being taught to tacitly approve of exploitative capitalistic system.

So progressives want to change our all our text books, even maths. They (the university elitists) want to include so called social justice into maths, adding "problems" to get people to "solve" social justice issues, all the time blaming "the west".

One such example of "social justice" is the cocoa farms in Ivory Coast and child slavery. Now we in the west don't set the laws in the Ivory Coast. Ivory Coast is a member of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. If we didn't buy cocoa someone else will. Do you see China, North Korea, African Union, Iran or any Islamic state doing anything about slavery? Do you see the progressive media saying anything about human trafficking? If we didn't buy the cocoa, what then would the progressive say about poverty?

The politics of attacking the west is duality. If you buy, you are exploiting, if you don't buy your a racist and increasing poverty. It is exploitation of guilt.

The answer is to respond with the truth and ask the most basic question, why are you so full of hate?

There is no progress in the left. Left is about going backwards.

The left talks about "no one left behind", but all the left want to do is take from those who do and give to those who don't. Equality isn't natural. The weather isn't equal. Rain fall isn't equal. Some countries are bigger. Some people are smarter than others. Some people die sooner than others. People don't have the same likes, wants or even needs.

Christian charity is and always has been the shinning light. North Korea would starved to death if it wasn't for western aid, but they got thousands of workers who will lose thier home, job and go to jail if they tell people they relabel aid from America as aid from China or even put into North Korean sacks. Most of the western aid that goes to Africa is relabelled as "Islamic" to appease Islam, who then thanks the west by saying the West isn't giving enough aid as most of the "aid" comes from "Islamic states".

Stop doing as progressives tell you. They are not your friends. They don't wish you well. They don't tolerate you. It isn't what they say, it is what they do. They betray you, they betray their own country.

What has the left given Africa? War, poverty and death.

Be a Christian. Be a patriot. What can you do? Do what progressive do, but when YOU talk of social justice, talk of Jesus and his lessons. Talk of the Christian anti-slavery league. Talk of western aid. Lobby to have ALL western aid delivered by western aid agencies only. Stop the relabelling of western aid. Take an active roll. When that fanatically left wing says something about your beliefs, remind that intolerant person, that it is your right. Take notes to remind yourself who is a "progressive" and who is "real Christian".

If you want to know who are the real progressives are, they are Real Christians. Is why the west is so successful. Don't ignore history, learn from it. Don't back down, Jesus didn't.

Divided We Fall

There needs to be a dedicated and focused “united front” against those who are united in hate against Christians and Judeo/Christian traditions.

To me the pairing of religion and politics makes perfect sense. We call to God, we thank God and our freedoms are based on the belief that every man, woman and child’s liberty comes directly from God. Look around the world, without Judeo/Christian traditions, there is no liberty. Yet over the years, those calling themselves communists, marxists, socialists, humanists and "secularists" have constantly and without pause cast insult after insult. The left preaches tolerance, but in action is anything but.

You don't have to look far to see various diverse groups are (temporarily) united by their hatred of Western civilization, America and Israel been at the forefront of this, but overall all Judeo/Christian traditions. If ANY Christian group expressed hatred on the scale that is seen by anti-Christian groups, the ACLU, unions, femanists and every other "ism" will be calling them nazis and taking legal action under socalled anti-discimination laws.

One should not need a trumplet blast from heaven in order to recognize that Christians as a whole need to regroup and refocus in order to present a united front against this very real and dire threat. They don't seek to convert you, they target your children into gangs, into radical groups and generally subvert your authority. It started as the left moved freom unionist, to university radical to areas of "interest" such as social studies teachers, as well as "traditional" left wing movements such as law, journalism and science.

In America, this is more evident with the large number of "campus reds" who don't work, don't really study and are members of many student groups and collect pay checks from "causes". Yet If you are a non-union contractor you to disclose your political contributions, but not the Union members. Obama plans to do it by through an Executive Order. Just another piece of Obama's social justice that doesn't include you or me.

The foes we fight are clever, vicious, dedicated, and completely amoral, which are a formidable combination. Remember they are not after you, they are in the schools and media constantly grooming children to radicalise, to be violent, to take drugs, to be anti-family and anti-christian. They have been ceaselessly undermining and subverting Christianity from both within and without. Every time a Union member is arrested, especially a school teacher, the Union gets supression order and covers it up under presumption of innocence, right to privacy and so on. Not so when any clergy is arrested. Now remember, the clergy member who did wrong, joined Chruch not for belief, but to asbuse position of trust. Media never puts things in perspective. How many lawyers know that they have a quilty client, but seek to get them off, knowing thier client is a criminal and will committ crimes again? How many school teachers are "shifted" and fired, but never disclosed as sex offender? How come their is social tolerance of professors who sleep with thier barely legal students? Why the coverup over Clinton's affairs with college girls (were they all over 18?). You don't know because the law is sellective. The media is selective.

You can start by looking at who you associate with. What you children are learning. Take interest in your children, all of them. Talk to them. All relationships are based on understanding. Don't assume, talk and tell and then listen. Don't talk for 30 minutes on dangers of drugs and leave it at that. Children are curious, if you don't know, don't make it up. Go with them to library or Internet. Remember pro-drug groups pay for studies, so make sure you not been duped with false information. Remember marijuana's popularity is because of the constant and unrelenting media (especially popular films) push that "pot" is harmless. Tobacco was "harmless". Cocaine was called harmless. Heroine was marketed legally as "safe". It started with small time disobience to see if they (the socialist group) has influence, once they influence the child, it starts with social inclusion to "parties' and events "away" from "uncool" parents. Socialists use grooming practices that you would associate with paedophilia. In fact most of these groups preach social immorality. Look at the "sex" revolution in the 1960s. Radicalising children, getting them to be violent, anti-family and sexually permissive then introducing them to hardcore drugs and turning young girls into prostitutes and even some went as far as turning kids into killers. Because socialists have the legal profession, particularly in America the ACLU, they enjoy protection.

ACLU associates itself not only with university marxists groups and environmental radicals, but a pedophile group known as many names including MANBOY. A sick group that wants age of consent for homosexual activities to be lowered to include pre-teen boys. Some even try use religion, claims God made them that way. The gay gene is another excuse. All this keeps society divided and on the defensive because Christians been forced under so called anti-discrimination laws to accept homosexuality. Despite constant warnings about the invalidity of the The Kinsey Reports, Truman and the democrats, along with the left wing intellectuals used these to "inflict" social change. KKK and other radical groups who were doing the bidding of the Democrats suddenly found themselves in conflict with the party that founded them and supported them since end of the civil war.

Example Robert Carlyle Byrd, who served as a U.S. Representative from 1953 until 1959 and as a U.S. Senator from 1959 to 2010. Was a member of the KKK for long time, but as Clinton put it, a brief association and he later changed his views and denounced racial intolerance. Byrd only knows for sure and he took that the his grave what he truely believed in. But he lectured often to youth to get them into politics and follow the "Democrats". What ever the party believes isn't what that party says. They all over the map. Are they racists? Are they upholding Christian values. KKK wasn't much to do with killing, but low level terrorism to get minority groups to vote Democrat and to oppress anyone who spoke out against Democrat policy of segregation, exploitation of minorities in employment and abuse of the minimum wage system, also credit exploitation where banks and Democrat businesses would deny credit to minorities. Yet activities by the KKK (as well as vote rigging) was used by the Kennedy clan to get into office.

Then all this KKK activity was put onto Christians as a whole. Branded right wing extremists. Many groups now praise Democrats as "saviours" of minority groups from persecution. Yet the civil rights bill was President  Dwight D. Eisenhower. John and Robert Kennedy opposed this bill. They don't even credit Ike with his victories in WW2, let alone civil rights bill, nor mention he founded NASA. Nor did they credit Ike with economic prosperity. Democrats engineered civil unrest using the KKK then got into power by telling KKK Democrats support them, telling minorities only Democrats can stand up to the KKK. Thus new era of Christian bashing had began. Kennedy once in office despite illegal activities is praised. This show you how far the media has devolved from independent voice of the people, peeking in 1940s, down to a left wing propaganda machine. How? because people assume. Never assume you know what a politican really stands for.

Long term fix is a party with Christian values and a willingness to expell anyone who steps off the platform. People voted for too long for left wing parties in the West because it what they told to do by the unions. Not just America, UK, Australia, Europe, Russia. The unions demand its members be left wing and vote for the left.

But left-right, these are distinctions invented by the left. Used to mean two sections of the socialists movement, left been the Marxist radicals and the right been the intellectuals. Later the get left wing views into mainstream, the left called themselves socialists under Lenin and Ho Chi Minh in Paris. Declaring the right to be "others", that others are the enemy.

Socialists lie. So don't beleive what people say, but what they do. Who they support. Remember a Democrat will talk tolerance to your face, because your the enemy and an adult. Behind your back they say mild slights against you. Turn everyone, every try turning your kids against you for been "conservative".

Altering language is what socialists do. They talk of tolerance, but they only mean do what your told. They talk of liberalism, but really mean marxism. Nothing to do with liberal tolerance, marxism doesn't tolerate anything that isn't marxism and the worship of Karl Marx.

While you can't force people to see the truth, you must not give in just because your opponent will not. What matters is if you give into your children, you will lose them. Marxists win by recruiting the youth into radical groups. Environmentalism is one of and most common cause today that marxists use to recruit kids. But they still use soft drugs and parties like they did in the 1960s. Another cause marxists use is poverty, Africa, Israel and in general war.

Remember marxists are not anti-war, they are against anyone opposing them. FARC, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea all call themselves freedom fighters. Say what you believe and it gets you killed. It isn't what marxism says, it is what they do. University students are radicalised because they easy lead astray because in school they already been undermined with history lessons talking of glorious revolts and liberations from oppression. Nothing on the rape, murder and torture used by so called liberators to create "zones of operation".

So start today with your children. Be more careful who you let into your home. Teach your children to be aware what grooming is. Stranger danger awareness is not enough. Predators come as your friend. Radicals will pose as peaceful. Union organisers can't be trusted, they get paid to keep people in the union. Teachers can't be trusted, they been brain washed into thinking they saving children.

Remember criminal elements are often patient. They will pose as nice, honest and even don't swear around the parents. Not all predictors abuse kids sexually. They recruit teens with drugs and alcohol. Or start with "radical causes".

If you don't take interest in your wife, husband, son, daughter, brother or sister. Predators will. Predators take  many forms, the bully, a gang, a drug dealer, sexual abuse. Most teens are abused sexually by other teens, usually ones slightly older. Only later do the "adult" predators move in.

Climate Change Scam.

Every good scam has some truth to it. Every season isn't the same. Some days are hotter and colder than others, some winters longer than others.

So lets start with the truths. Polar ice is melting, no denying that. So don't deny climate change but understand that Climate has ALWAYS been in change and the recent changes were known, expected and been exploited by "university elitists".

But not all truths of climate science is been told. Have you ever had a weather prediction from the day before be right? How about long term predictions be right? Not often right?

Ever heard of the solar cycle? Did you know sun's output isn't constant? That is has a cycle? The solar variation causes some weather and climate on Earth. The cycle is observed by counting the frequency and placement of sunspots visible on the Sun. Weather been what we see daily and climate been the over all seasons. This solar cycle has been observed and studied for over 100 years.

UV impact is been ignored. No one wants admit the failure over hole in ozone from CFCs. This UV is what is melting the ice and why record snow falls lead to record floods. Nothing to do with CO2.

CO2 is natural. Did you know it the O2 levels too high, you die just as easy if they too low.

We always been in a greenhouse, without the greenhouse effect the planet would be deadly cold.

I show you climate change is been around since the beginning of Earth itself. How many ice ages we had? Wasn't the world hotter and more tropical (as shown from fossils) when dinosaurs roamed?

Didn't the ice cover most of the world? Wasn't there fossils that show Antarctica once had forests?

So really isn't Climate Change real and natural? Sure I want polution controlled.

But behind the climate change by green peace and the green party is socialism.

Here is list of "questions" asked by The Greens on climate change:

• Do you agree or disagree with the following?
• If people work hard, they almost always get what they want?
• Laws of nature are responsible for differences in wealth in society?
• It is virtually impossible to eliminate poverty?
• Most people who don't get ahead in our society should not blame the system, they have only themselves to blame?
• Social class differences reflect differences in the natural order of things?
• There will always be poor people, because there will never be enough jobs for everybody?
• If people wanted to change the economic system to make things equal, they could?
• It is unfair to have an economic system which produces extreme wealth and extreme poverty at the same time?
• There are no inherent differences between rich and poor, it is purely a matter of the circumstances into which you are born?
• Our customs and national heritage are the things that have made us great, and certain people should be made to show greater respect for them?
• Our prisons are a shocking disgrace. Criminals are unfortunate people who deserve much better care, instead of so much punishment?
• Obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues children should learn?
• Organisations like the army have a pretty unhealthy effect upon men because they require strict obedience of commands from supervisors.
• The courts are right in being easy on drug offenders. Punishment would not do any good in cases like these?
• Being kind to bludgers or criminals will only encourage them to take advantage of your weakness, so it's best to use a firm, tough hand when dealing with them?
• Realistically, nothing will be done about climate change until it's too late?
• The impacts of climate change on people's lives are huge?
• I think climate change will affect me personally?
• The impacts of climate change are really beyond my control?
• Climate change may mean that wealth and resources end up being distributed more fairly?
• Doing something about climate change is an opportunity to be part of something bigger than ourselves?
• I have stopped listening to people go on about climate change because I am tired of hearing about the topic?
• Individuals can make a difference to climate change?
• I feel it is my ethical responsibility to change my individual behaviour to combat climate change?
• The thought of climate change scares me?
• Climate change will foster greater community spirit and connectedness?
• The impacts of climate change are inevitable now so there's not much point worrying about it?
• I don't have the information I need to reduce the impact of climate change?
• Climate change will result in financial hardship for many people?
• Responding to climate change will cost a lot of money?
• There's nothing we can do about climate change that will make a meaningful difference?
• There are meaningful things I can do to reduce the impact of climate change?
• Individuals working together can make a difference to climate change ?
• People should be accountable to the whole of society for their behaviours?
• I don't like being morally judged for my private behaviours ?
• I don't have enough money to do things that would reduce the impact of climate change?
• Attempting to respond to climate change will cost the country too much money?
• I don't have enough time to do things that would reduce the impact of climate change?
• I try not to think about climate change?
• Trying to do something about climate change will mean a lot of people lose their jobs?
• The whole climate change issue could turn out to be one gigantic mistake by scientists ?
• I feel a moral duty to do something about climate change?
• The challenge of climate change will provide people with a sense of purpose?
• The existence of widespread economic differences does not mean that they are inevitable?
• There are many reasons to think that the economic system is unfair?
• Poor people are not essentially different from rich people?
• Equal distribution of resources is a possibility for our society?
• Economic differences in the society reflect an illegitimate distribution of resources?
• Economic positions are legitimate reflections of people's achievements?
• Equal distribution of resources is unnatural?
• There is no point in trying to make incomes more equal?

Most of these questions have nothing to do with climate, climate change or if it natural, man-made or can be changed or how to go about it.

No one is equal to another. Are we going to alter smart people so they are not smarter than the "slowest". Some people are taller, going to alter them? Some people are beautiful, going change them so they don't look more beautiful than another? Some can run faster, some can't run but can swim faster. Some can juggle, some are left handed, some can see better than others. Some people can't see, going make everyone blind? Not everyone likes the same sports. So if only 500 people go see women's football play, going to force the men's team to only have 500 tickets sold? Why take money from successful sports to support those that are not?

Equality was ment for and only for law. Well we saw how well the Democrats stuck to that. They still are not equal in the law. Making special laws to protect minorities is discrimination and still unconstitutional. Besides Jesus tried to teach us not to fight evil with evil.

Can't fight climate change with money, with rhetoric about wealth. Wealth didn't melt the ice, UV did that. If climate change was going make all these new green jobs and green industry, Al Gore would spent his $400m in ill-gotten gains on solar panels and not invest in Apple making iPods and iPhones using conflict minerals from Africa in China.

London Burning.

As we enter the third day of left wing terrorism in London, I can't help notice the usual tripe from the media about social problems and putting the blame onto others. This is violence for political sake. It is to drive out peaceful residence who are not part of the anti-Christian, anti-social culture of parent-less drug youth. The riots are not random. They using mobile phones, getting outside information, spotters telling them where police are. This is an organised terrorist act by nameless groups.

But the left wing media will have you believe it is random. It is inspired by the shooting of a youth. But it is not about that. They targeting stores, looting from middle class hard-working people. Burning cars belonging to ordinary citizens who only committed no crime.

The left talk about poverty and long term unemployment and lack of opportunity. But these are kids. Some young as 11. They not motived by joblessness, they are a mob following the leader. Filled with sense of entitlement constantly drummed into them by combination of marxism, drug culture, violent video games, lax parents, anti-Christian and anti-family politics from the left.

The guardian will have you believe it is the new governments fault. The government didn't shoot someone. A group of police did. The TV plays some video from anarchists claiming it is about police having too much power. But really do you believe someone hiding their face and committing crimes using excuses they heard from a socialist website? You think children buy into the politics or just like the offer of drugs, alcohol, looting and setting fires to live out the fantasy life portrayed in ultraviolent games and backed by older thugs looking to push a political agenda and excuse by socialist media looking to drag society down into the gutter.

Kids are too young to understand. The rioters would not like it if someone entered thier room, broke stuff, burnt their stuff or stole their stuff. But these kids are not raised with respect or learnt to respect others. Nor does the media blame the criminality on the kids, the university elitists who excuse it. Labor looking to recover lost support are going to side with the mob. So can't expect Brittish opposition party(s) to be onside with government. Nor with the police.

The police are not to blame. They doing their job. Faced with a culture of drugs, handguns and defiance. Criminals are encouraged by their fellow criminals to defy police, to make trouble. The left, especially drug dealers encourage criminality and violence to create "lawless zones" so they (the drug dealers) can exploit the weak, the poor and the addicted. Drugs been so highly addictive.

Poor is not excuse to commit crime. Majority of poor, majority of people are peaceful. The problem is with the culture of unions, lawyers, media and even teachers making excuses for what is a brat. Cure is discipline. More not less police. Teen punks need to learn a lesson. But so do the instigators and organisers. The intellectuals encouraging, preaching and coordinating "anarchy operations" should get jailed for criminal conspiracy and be held to account for damage.

One of the reasons why insurance is so high and businesses finding it so hard is the damage done by these punks. The reason why youth unemployment so high for so long, the long term labor party who did nothing but borrow lots. Then tell these kids the reason why the end to free money that they somehow entitled to is rich not paying enough tax. Well kids too lazy to learn and already full of entitlement are not going to check facts, not going ask their disinterested parents or read the newspapers which just going tell them blame to banks.

Answer is easy to say, hard to do. Discipline. Not only the youth, but the parents. Governments can't keep borrowing. The left wing intellectuals need to be held to account for lighting the fire, the left policy is recruit youth, radicalise them and turn them into rioters. The youth so filled with sense of entitlement feel it is funny, they get a sense of power from stealing. But so short term, short sighted are these youth, so willing to be pawns, don't see the future. Who wants hire them, they can't be trusted. They tell lies, resort to violence. So much for the peaceful left.

These kids lack Christian values. The unions not giving them moral guidance. The left wing media isn't giving them a future. The university elitists not going to give them jobs or medical care. The people sending the text messages don't want them to be happy and employed. Drug dealers don't care you can't afford your next fix or who you steal from (as long as it not them). Nor care someone stole from you (unless it was their stash).

You think the marxists if they got into power would tolerate these youth? They just useful idiots to use a marxist term.

The left says go soft, but going soft is what these kids deep down don't want. Going soft will not win respect, not break up the mob. Nor is sending in the dogs blindly. Break up the mob. Shut down mobiles in riot areas. Hard on the ring leaders. Break up the left wing cells. Jail the intellectuals behind the riots.