Patriotism required more NOW than any time in HISTORY.

We need Patriotism NOW more than at anytime in history. Without Patriots we cannot maintain civilization. In world one two and the cold war we stood up to the mafia, socialism, communism and despotism. Can you do no less for others? We have stumbled but not fallen, but the fanatics have not stoped. Terrorism didn't die with Osama's death. Greenpeace is a just as much a treat to freedom as islamic terrorism or Mexican drug gangs. Give in to neither. Mafia didn't just stop doing crime because Al Capone got jailed. Culture of Corruption in the Democrates didn't stop just because Rod Blagojevich (Democrat, impeached governor of Illinois) got caught. Timothy Geithner, Obama’s choice to head the Treasury Department and the ailing nation’s crucial economic rescue, has admitted that he failed to pay $34,000 in taxes from 2001 to 2004 and that his housekeeper was not legally authorized to work in the U.S.

There has been haressment of scientists and journalists who don't support the "co2 global warming swindle".

There been haressment of journalists who don't support Obama.

There is huge and wasteful funding of "co2" studies, including a satelitte launched solely to measure co2. When this satelitte didn't show a massive build up of co2 in the upper atmosphere, something weather balloons already showed, the data from Nasa is ignored by the UN commission.

The European and Russian space agency reported solar flares and magnetic storms directly corralate to increases in temperatures from 1 to 6 degrees above "normal" (normal been only the last 400 years). G. W. Bush accepted climate change, but one based on solar cycles and not co2, so he bravely and rightly ignored the co2 scam. But Democrats want bankrupt America, because they feel America, power and wealth belongs to them, from corrupt Hollywood to greedy universities to political bullies like Greenpeace and the ever greedy unions, Democrats are not short on supply of fanatics, but the are not (yet) a clear majority and not yet destroyed Democracy.

Democrats tried before with the civil war when they succeeded and then attacked the north. Not over states rights. The Democrats had a childish and petty trantrum when they lost the "unlosable" election to unknown republican Lincon. The republicans were not expect to win as they had poor turnout in first election they tried. Democrats had no other political party running against them and didn't expect to be any again.

Obama is criminal, but Democrats skating thin ice, banking on a the corruption of bias in the courts, media and universities.

Universities need to be depolitical. Corruption of biased needs to be grounds for dismissal of judges (judical misconduct). Democrats have stacked unions, universities, courts with political appointees. Patriots need to act now against illegal immigrants, drug pushers and left wing agents (greenpeace to socialists organisations).

The Great Global Warming Swindle.

You have been lied to. There is no "global warming" debate. Those who thousands of "climate" scientists who push "Global Warming" are lying to you. Al Gore lied to you. You may think why would 2500 on the UN Climate Change body lie? Well most of those in the UN Climate Change "study" are not scientists, many a research assistants, university appointees, government appointees and Un appointees to keep the budget high, to make the commission look impressive and to make you think Global Warming is a real threat to you so you keep the money flowing.

At core of The Great Global Warming Swindle isn't employment, but lobby groups who get funding for the green-capitalist. On other side of the The Great Global Warming Swindle is the green-politican, the vote chaser and then on the fringe is the "anti-establishment" who will thinks the film Mars Attacks is a documentary and there is a big cover up.

So tens of thousands of protesters, most of whom are there out of political belief. Are not only wrong, they are part of the swindle.

Who is been swindled? Well Africa is been swindled. American tax payers been swindled. Where is the money going? It is going to companies in Russia, Europe, China, India, United States of America, Mexico, Brazil and to some extent Malaysia, Australia and handful of other countries. But not all, it is only going to those who "support" the The Great Global Warming Swindle. So much money is involved in "Green Trading" that Goldman Sachs and George Soros already investing billions into "co2 trading". The public Affairs Institute is funded by Soros and others while calling themselves progressives are anything but.

They are bullies, they are using Climate change to stop progress outside the "big three" of Russia-China-USA. How can tens of thousands of "non-working" protesters afford expensive camping equipment, all those gas bottles for cooking, all those brand new polar suits they wearing on long cold nights (which goes against global warming since we just had a very cold and long winter in the northern hemisphere). Greenpeace claims private donations. That is not true according to co-founder. Even the co-founder of Greenpeace has stated that Global warming has become a political movement that shouts down and tries to crush anyone who speaks against the "green lie".

Yes there is polution and we must stop it and clean up. Yes there is co2 and we must be efficient in industry. But beyond that is the "certification" bully. Those economic and political bullies who want crush the worlds economy and send Europe back to the dark ages, keep Africa in the dark ages but also keep 90% of the world in a "worker bee" cubical, controlled by guilt, debt and politics under guise of environmental protection.

Remember Simpson's Movie, the EPA, the least effective government branch wanting to be the "most powerful". They make the president some right wing movie star that in past episodes appeared as a republican, as a "imitation" Arnie. Yet leading the lobby to make EPA the most powerful government agency (at time of movie's making and still is) is the far left wing Al Gore and the extremists George Soros (who personal given Obama a million dollars a year for long time). So doubt the Global Warming nazis are lying to you and putting propaganda where ever they can to "program" you to follow the Global Warming lie and support "socialists" leaning governments.

Remember history? Adolf Hitler, a socialist come to power in times of dire economic collapse. German financial system, industrial system and military were in ruins. Unemployment at record high. Hitler never told a lie. Everything Hitler said was true, even his plan for war. Anyone who took Hitler as a serious threat was ridiculed. The British unions ridiculed Tory's, especially Churchill (who went on to lead Brittan in war time while left leaning Democrats tried to keep out of the war at same time profiting from it). Even today Churchill  (but so is Hitler) is portrayed as war monger by Socialists and Stalin as a hero. Even though Hitlers rise to power was funded by Stalin. Hitler was armed by Stalin. German army trained in Russia. BOTH Germany and Russia invaded Poland. Hitler was backed into power by bankers (many of them who were Jews), as well as many of the unions. Nazi party grew in numbers from 100,000 in 1920s to milllions in 1930s. Most of them school teachers, university professors. Many post war who moved into the "green movement". Hitler was a keen environmentalist who wanted preserve Germany's vast forests.

But we get the "watered" down and "stamp of approval" version of Hitler. Which confuses most people because it doesn't make sense because people don't understand how terrible life was in the economic depression and Hitler was selling Hope. Unlike Obama Hitler delivered jobs. He got gangs off the streets. He kept repeat offenders in prison for full term. So much did people hate the old political parties, even the socialists for ruining Germany they were happy to ban them all. Just look at Obama, all the hate they spreed about "greedy" republicans and "anti-job" republicans. Those "nasty" republicans who didn't support Obama's bills. Isn't point of democracy to have opposition parties who question and oppose the ruling party? In fact wasn't is left wing movements that said "it matter of patriotism" to question the president (at that time they were questioning everything Nixon did, never apologising until his dead for the lies they told).

While Obama isn't a mass murderer and yet to jail citizens of his country for opposing him, it is getting close. Considering how hostile Obama supporters are to anyone who "opposes" Obama on open borders, health care to illegal immigrants, schooling for illegal immigrants, tax the rich (Steve Jobs supported this, but his was already rich and knew he was dying and cared what people would say about him, he didn't want go down in history as the tyrant boss who put tens of thousands of Americans out of work so he could made 1billion dollars making iCrap in China). Obama uses the word hope like Hitler and animated speak like Hitler. Just like Hitler he makes speaks to the political mind. Even abuses power like Hitler did. Building himself a fancy fortress with government money. Special cars. Special trust funds. Special tax sheltered education funds for his children. Special trips for his wife. Anyone for shopping trip to Spain? Now Obama wants extend jailing of terror suspects in the Patriot act. Not aimed at the rioting protestors who so far have destoryed billions in government and private property. Not at the massive number of stolen, burnt out and missing cars during "rages" organised by socialists in universities (who funded by Democrats via taxpayers). But at Christian groups the muslim advisor to Obama says is a threat to "his democracy" So by saying Obama must go, the muslim advisor to Obama has labeled Christians as terrorists. We can't call the real terrorists terrorist because it not politically correct.

Now we can't say no to "global carbon" trading because the terrorists are making the rules and Obama is the lacky of the Green lie. Soros and others (not all Democrats and in fact not all are American). Russian, Chinese and Indian billioniars lined up to keep 2/3 of the world in poverty and bleed the rest of the world using "poverty" and "climate change" and "jobs" as a means to bully you. When that doesn't work they will unleash the drug-crazed teenagers hyped up with mix of music, celebrities, politics, promised, marijunia, fast cars, loose woman and "unlimited freedom" without responsability. All using matras from the 50s and 60s like parents are so uncool, parents will not let you do anything, parents only want control you, parents are to blame for all the problems.

Abuse of power isn't new. Jesus was surrounded by it everyday.

So google "The Great Global Warming Swindle." you will learn about the Global Warming movement is a façade for those who's hearts are full of lust and greed. Like Al Gore who made 400m on his "movie" and then went onto buy his way onto Apple. All these "green" scientist who lie to you on daily basis. Yes there is climate change, but these climate scientists can't even predict when it going to rain. Even when it is raining, they go by their text books and tell you clear skys. So if the weather channel tells you clear skys and yet it is raining, why would you trust them on Climate Change.

Al Gore lied. He left out of his chart the 14th centuary "mini ice age" where over 100 years Europe was in deep freeze, so cold was winter that Thames was completely iced over, so thick people ice skated up/down the river and held ice fares on the ice.

What about Vine Hill in London, used to be so hot in summer during the middle ages that the Catholics had vine yards up and down England, even in places that now are frozen most of the year. But nearly 1000 years ago those now frozen fields of north England were vine yards.

Climate has been hotter than it is now. Climate has been so violent in past that ships didn't put to sea, but only hugged coast. The world China mapped in 1425, the coast line is different. In Netherlands (Holland to most) there is a Roman outpost 14m under the north Sea. Some time after the fall of the Roman empire, the sea levels rose. Can't be explained by co2, especially man made co2.

The Climate is changing and always changing. Like all good cons, they start with the truth. Just like Hitler, Stalin, Al Capone, Roosevelt and Marx, todays crimianls like Obama, Soros and other Al Gore use the same tactics as past criminals. They use the truth a little and what sounds like the truth a lot. They bully, threaten and use influence, but mostly they use gangs of followers to get power and wealth. No one gone to extremes like Stalin and Hitler, but who's to say how far Obama and others will go because they unchallenged by the public unwilling to defy the mob. The mob is only small, but violent. The green mafia is a false front for Islamic-Socialist-Communist dictatorship. The Green Swindle like the oil crisis of the 1970s is scam.

Steve Jobs. The sin of greed.

We have heard lots about Steve Jobs. Mostly only good things and praise. Praise from the politician's who's palms he greased. From his employees, who's loyalty was demanded at threat of unemployment and loss of benefits. From the media run by men and women who admire how manipulative Jobs was and how wealthy he was. From the business world who both admired and envied his power.

Jobs was a penny pincher who demanded greater discounts from suppliers. When American electronics were, as he consider it, too expensive, he changed to Japanese, Korean and eventually Chinese suppliers. When cost of labor was "more than he was prepared to pay" he out sourced more and more production to China. Thousands lost thier jobs, just so Steve could buy more praise and silence from his "friends" like Obama. 2010 Obama fly across the country to talk to Steve Jobs on "tech jobs" and the economy. Yet the media says Obama is the most powerful man, indeed if Obama was so powerful, why did he travel to meet with Jobs and not the other way around? Indeed if Obama when running for president claiming he had all the solutions and more, hope, have to travel to Jobs for advice? Or instructions was it Obama receiving instructions from his paymasters. After all it was Obama who demanded a billion dollars for his campaign (and with who is he going to spend it, what is Obama promising the money men in return). Job knew he was dying, but still was cheating his employees out of work, making deals with China. So what employment was the dying Jobs promising Obama? What economic tips could jobs offer? Jobs made his wealth cheating others.

Jobs cheated his suppliers out of fair share of the profits. Jobs stood on the shoulders of giants and assembled computers, not invented. He hired software programmers and took a large bite of the apple. He took ideas from science fiction and had his teams of engineers design and prototype, all the time putting his name as head of project. Of course patents went in his name.

Jobs was a control freak who demanded loyalty and used his wealth as a stick. Publicly he knew how to control his emotions and come across as what people wanted to see. He knew how to buy admiration with false modesty and false charity. He knew how to buy respect from politicians. Politicians who promised YOU employment, all the while lining their pockets with Job's political donations, knowing fullwell Jobs generosity was dependant on Apple getting "good public" support.

Jobs got rich on American taxpayers. If it wasn't tax breaks, it was education grant programs and government incentives. Yet Apple sent thousands of American jobs to China and sent American electronics manufacturing industry to the wall.

Steve Jobs and his cohorts pludered the American economy selfishly. All because the American public is too distracted with the extreme left who want control everything and the extreme right who want to own everything.

So have to wonder when are you going to trash your iPhone, iPad and other tools of deception and slavery. Can you leave the house without your phone? Can you leave your phone at home without fear your boss will call to check on something that can't wait until reasonable work time?

How often have you gone to work to hear about more cut backs? More outsourcing? How often have you heard government departments outsourcing? All these are things Apple corp did. Is Obama YOUR president or Stever Jobs and cohorots man? Is Obama offer substance or hope?

Why is it you put your hope in Obama and not Christ? After all Jesus lived up to his word and delivered his promised all within three years. Obama can't go three days without lying.Jesus never lied his entire life.

Steve Jobs was only interest in his wealth and welbeing.

Jesus loved and cared for us all.

I think it about time we stopped praising Steve Jobs and other "capitalists".

Give your admiration to Jesus Christ, our Saviour. Jobs, Obama and the Democrats sold you out and been giving your tax money to make themselves rich.

The left and right wing extremists are pushing and pulling you. The universities and the media going far left, banks and industry going far right. Both two extremes of the same coin. Both want to own, control and feed off your labours like a parasite.

Don't praise Jobs. Don't believe you need anything he has to sell. Jobs didn't work hard. He didn't plow the fields to feed his family. He didn't spend hours operating in children's clinics to save the sick. He didn't comfort the dying. Steve Jobs drove up the cost of living so he could have bank accounts with lots of numbers ending with lot of zeros. He didn't put Apples in schools for the kids to learn, he put them in schools so you think it would make them smarter and make you buy his expensive and ultimately worthless toys, so he didn't have to plow fields. Steve Jobs beleived in the minimum wage, as long as it wasn't him earning it.

Your sin of greed is letting him do it in small hope you can be like him.

911 Ten Years on.

The attacks on September 11, 2001 were planned, calculated to inflict damage, terror and confusion. Who, what, when, where and why. Those who did it admitted it. But left behind confusing and misleading information. Deliberate and calculated to get people to discuss, enquire and be told all about the religion of the attackers, but for those in that religion to deny it was "all about their" religion. The mystery about 911 is fuel to fire for deniers, conspiracy theorists who want sell books, promote ideology or to blame the government in wild and unfounded accusations.

Thankfully most kept their heads and hearts and knew the attacks were done, planned, executed and part of wider plans. They didn't submit, they didn't run and hide, they didn't cower waiting to die. They did what a patriotic Christian should do. While you turn a check to insults, you don't bear your chest to be murdered. You don't live you life on your knees denying the evil around you like so many others did and done.

Don't let 911 be propaganda for those who did it, remember how those people cheered 911. Never forgot those people deny with one face, but with another face, one they hide from the public, the curses.

The marxists and university elitists with thier conspiracy websites and outrageous blame games are themselves to blame. In Spain the left suggested on internet how a bombing would scare the public and shift the election to the socialists, that such a shift will undrmine support. Sure enough, a scared public after the train bombing stopped supporting efforts in Afganistan.

Mass protests and death threats against a Danish cartoonist. London bombings lifted level of fear, but this time people didn't cower.

The left tried counter with lies and scare tactics over camp ray-x. Obama for all his rhetoric, once he learnt what those in camp x-ray have done and how no country wants them. How most released terrorists gone back to terrorism and piracy. Yet Obama done nothing to change the laws, improve security or even assure public he is doing something. Instead Obama wants you to run and hide, to draw down troops, to not worry.

Why is it ten years later we don't have adequate laws in any country against this hate group? Why are we so soft on terrorists, pirates and drug couriers? Answer is politicians want votes. If there isn't a "big issue" to scare voters, the politicians like Obama can't win elections. Politicians like Obama rely on speaking, not action. Obama wasn't then and isn't now a man of action. He is about draw downs and kick backs and fancy speeches. Isn't time you send Obama back to Kenya?

Environment & Green Living

I don't agree to any Carbon Tax in any form. I don't agree that it is the easiest way, nor the cheapest. We see people from all over the place pushing E.T.S. Why? Because those pushing for it are going to make money. They talk about E.T.S. as exciting, nothing exciting about hiring people are minimum wage to go about measuring carbon and other output on WESTERN businesses in Europe, Australia and US then trading carbon certificates while India, China and Brazil, the top 3 polluters push for 50 years to pollute to "catch up" to G7. New doesn't mean better, exciting or even profitable. Nothing new about trading.

We wouldn't be in the mess if Brazil, India and China didn't deforest half the world. Doesn't help the Africa deforest either. Doesn't help when France talks about leading the way when certain socialist French president's family involved in transportation of illegally logged timber. Doesn't help when Indonesia still slashs and burns forests to clear land for coffee. Doesn't help when China wants no one to measure their Co2.
Doesn't help when Brazil, China and India bash west as racist when they don't practice free or fair trade.
So what if Europe has a carbon tax? If the Green left says jump, that doesn't mean we reply with how high. We should question ANY new tax. Because they lie when they claim only the polutors pay. I never seen any business "absorb" taxation or any other cost increase.

If the carbon tax is so good for Europe, why is Europe in an economic mess?

IF they care so much about the environment and "green living" then why is it the protestors always set fires, cause a riot and cost society billions to clean up the mess. The riots every G7 summit or world leaders meeting or even the protests during Kyoto. Some protests (really they were riots) cost some governments billions in clean-up costs. Money that didn't go to hospitals, schools or even environmental projects.

Real people go clean up messes not protest to force others to clean up for them. Adults try teach their kids put trash in the bin and do the right thing, not lead with their emotions and run riot for attention and blackmail. How can we have renewable industries if the greens keep saying no to dams, logging and even desalination plants. What green jobs when wind farms are made by GE and imported. What green jobs when greens say no to Hydro-electric dams on the Franklin and other rivers because they want the "forest pristine". Funny how these protestors turn politicans are all about getting attention, talk about making achievements for the environment, when really they about lining thier pockets with so called "fund raising". What have these protestors come political activists come politicans really acheived?

What else do you call a protest for money if it not blackmail? Isn't extortion using threat of violence for money black mail? Maybe greenpeace should be declared a terrorist group because of the continued violence at G7 meetings.

China, India, Brazil product 2/3 of the world's pollution. In 50 years they will have covered the planet and rising global temperatures 2 degrees. Then they talk of untold "richs" unlocked from under the ices and so called "new horizons" in jobs and wealth from the tens of millions of tons of oil, gold, tin, copper and coal unlocked from under the ice in Canada, China, Mongolia, Greenland, Antarctica and northern Russia. So I don't believe any scientists when scientists are the people who come up with the green lie. Those sounding the alarm are the ones getting paid to "consult" on green issues, to "measure" polution and "offset it".

It is about money and fame and glory, not green or environment. Only about making a living by elitist few who pat each other on the back at "green awards" and "environmental" conventions and laugh all the way to the bank on the prospects of "day trading" carbon credits in a "new" trading market. Only green living I see is Bob Brown buying future stock in c02 certificates and ripping off the public so he can "retire" to his "modest house" with view of pristine forest while the rest of Australia has to work 5-15 more years to pay off the debt he and his mob of fanatics rung up on the public's purse. A few token jobs, most of them short term. With retraining YOU have pay for. With not everyone, not even half those taking all these training schemes going to get work. Obama hasn't delivered new jobs (except for all the new jobs in China thanks to more factories closing in other parts of the work).

Meanwhile science isn't going to tell you over the next 24 years the output of the sun will increase (google solar cycle), that co2 is natural part of the cycle (photosynthesis), trees not carbon tax reduces co2, but the green scientists are not going tell you if co2 falls too low the planet will cool so fast, no amount of tax is going to stop the ice age. Nor is science going to stop politicians, environmentalists and fanatics partying on the profit and squandering. So more tax is just going to keep them partying on behind closed doors even longer. But they will call it fund raising.

Green should not be political. There is no green party. Those who call themselves greens are fanatics who are running a scam to benefit themselves. Mostly backed by scientists who wants to "study" and not do real work like everyone else.

Really greens want to be political dominating. Using catch phrases, guilt and in some cases terrorism. Riots in London are not the first, nor last. They riots G7 meetings. They helped plot a bombing in Spain to win an election. Unless YOU become a PATRIOTIC Christian and stop been a complacent Sunday (or Saturday) only believer, then liberty is lost.

Economics of Contempt

This is not going to be one of those posts that bashes S&P’s decision to downgrade the US, but then says that S&P was probably right about America's political system. The left-wing radicals, the "inside" men and other anti-Christian haters will bash S&P for me, but what they going to offer you is a biased look and definitely no insight.

I'll leave the S&P bashing to those bilking the government, from New York finance lawyers on George Soros's payroll to university lecturers who real world experience in poverty, debt and finance is offering "assist" college girls pay off a "bit of debt" that ends up them becoming lap / pole dancers. Fact is people debt and drugs go hand in hand with moral decline, not all drugs are illegal and drugs come in many forms. Spending large and praise are addictive drugs. Obama "feeds" on praise, applause and seems to have available rooms full of cheering brainwashed youth on hand when he needs background noise for one of his many press conferences.

S&P have yet to be proven wrong on assessment and forecast, but have been shown they have made a very embarrassingly blunder on the basic budget numbers, as everyone knows now, they were forced to remove that section from their report, and change their rationale for the downgrade. Yet somehow left would have you believe when S&P make one mistake, all their actions are flaws. Same group of know-it-alls refuse to acknowledge the tens of thousands of mistakes they made. Nor can they offer any clear alternative. All these left wing fanatics offer is constant criticism. Yes, I know I criticise Obama, but the man is so flawed (what Democrats call a colourful character), besides Obama doesn't listen to criticism, he hears only praise and applause. Besides his idea of modest is having a couple of homes with over 1m each. How can you not critise him for been so far out of touch when people can't even afford one home and work 50-80 hours a week.
S&P’s rationale for the downgrade now changed to one based entirely on their political judgement. But this is what most rating agencies do to forecast. If you want know what government is going to do, it is fair assessment to say a Democrat don't change, just like a snake in the grass. The left-wing and Democrats will always feel any ratings agency that doesn't subscribe to their politics is wrong. Like all dictatorial groups, not just Democrats, don't been told they are not effective, they lack direction and lost focus. Worse is when you demonstrate Democrats act in best interest of themselves.

I'll give you some examples of how Democrats don't change their ways. Bill Clinton sexually harassed women as governor and as president. Al Gore sexually harassed women, rarely reported, but his public harassment of some masseuse in a hotel (his mistake is she was a masseuse and not the kind of girl who says she is a massage worker). Soros who dated for five years a Brazilian actress (like she loved him for his charm right?) promised her a New York apartment, while still in bed he slapped and tried to chock her (sound familiar yet?), he told her (they supposed to be making up) he gave the place to some other woman. It not just left in America, how many French socialists lately and in past sexually harassed young women? Or been in relationships that only involve women been given money for sex? Not just woman's issues do Democrats are dismal at. Education, Ted Kennedy was to say, a loud mouth. His favourite was talking loud, often and for as long as he could. His favourite was to bash anyone's ear about education and spending more. He would go on and on about high cost of education. He never lowered it. He never tried stop universities raising fees. He never challenged one institution. His "game" was to protect Democrats putting money into "education" as tax deduction and political tool.

It’s true that the debt limit debate was ridiculous, but not for reasons Obama would have you believe. Obama going on TV to tell the public to harass congress to submit to Obama's will is Stalinist. Obama giving press conferences to select pro-Obama media and having cheering youth on hand is Stalinist. Obama is acting the same as Kim Jong-il or Hugo Charvez or Joseph Stalin.

Obama and the Democrats have always acted like children, that is they let their emotions run when told no. But this is typical of left-wing universities elitists. Obama's on nicotine patches, so really he is worse than a child having a temper tantrum because they been denied sugar candy. Most of the sitting Democrats are rich and richer than Republicans. Obama's wealth comes from phoney book. It is a phoney. A thick dull set of books that really tell you nothing that hasn't been written, perhaps in far less words, in the press or you can eventually find in government archives. If you looking for career advice on been president, that isn't really covered. Obama's relationship with extremely wealthy Democrats who trawl universities looking for "colourful" characters (not skin colour you bigots, but people with certain personality types).

S&P’s assessment is serious, you should take serious interest in how Democrats, not just in Congress, but the senate with its contingent of long term sitting crazy billionaire socialists. True they are going to serve in perpetuity on Earth, but in terms of how long these corrupt Democrats sit, it feels like eternity when you see how much wealth sitting Democrats have accumulated while supposedly on humble government payroll.

Fact is the make up of any government is set to change. The problem isn't with who is coming in, it is what those who have been sitting now for long time been doing. The damage done to USA's economy is constantly and still is been blamed on the Republicans. When Obama come into office, he had what most would consider a green light. Uncontested majority, he could pass bills with ease. He said he had an agenda of hope and change. Just two words, but hope is something the poor live with, change is something all the radicals demand and the poor hope for. Meanwhile Democrats are the richest and gotten richer. Soros made over 1 billion on the economic downgrade in the UK that saw thousands lose thier jobs. Soros claims he feels bad he pass tax at a less rate than his employees, same time he puts the the cent, the most he can into tax deductions and political donations. Don't listen to a Democrat and believe them, look at what they do.

The simple fact is that Obama has done the damage. Unlike Clinton who did all his damage second term. Even some Democrats admit Clinton's first term was due to riding the wave of economic activity from his "predecessor" (don't you love it when Democrats can't say the name of a Republican unless they insulting them). Democrats were almost certainly at the height of their power when Obama come to office. Democrats controlled senate as president G.W. Bush come to end of second term. President doesn't have all the power. No magic wand, no stroke of the pen. It is a Democracy, don't let Democrats sing you a lullaby about land of milk and honey if they had all the power. Fact is they have had 70% control for nearly 30 years and haven't delivered milk that isn't high in sugar or honey tainted with some poison. Welfare is good to those who need it, but what most people need is jobs. Democrats like Al Gore talked of Solar Power and Electric cars. Yet Al Gore got 400 million and put it into Apple. Not solar panels, but iPods and iPhones. Not American jobs, but thousands of jobs in China. At a factory with the highest rate of worker suicide. Al Gore contribution to global issues.

The debt ceiling debate doesn't reflect some sort of secular change in US policy making. The next time there’s a Republican president, Democrats will engage in the same kind of political dirty tricks they done since President Eisenhower. You’d have to be stunningly naive not to believe this. For the most part the media is always silent come election time about how corrupt, inept and wasteful the Democrats are. Simply assuming that every political confrontation represents a change in US politics and policy making is ridiculous, but facing down Obama has been a huge shift. Remember Obama's victory was huge. Not because he is the first non-white, but for turnout of voters and level of expectation.

S&P tries demonstrate that by the time the 2012 elections roll around, it will be too late to act on debt. Please, ignore the left wing intellectuals and hard-core Democrat media. Without meaningfully change that will affect government's long-term solvency is patently only visible to the few. Only few historians seem to remember that in Germany the economic collapse was due to debt, but with that come the occupation of Munich by left wing radicals. That wide spread economic mayhem was caused by the same radicals that pushed government spending beyond means. That these radicals were funded by outside sources. So few see the same things happening again. Unions funding student radicals, Obama himself a radical.

Some lawyer, if he is one, says he knows these S&P guys. Then says not those particular guys, John Chambers or David Beers personally. But says "I know" the rating agencies intimately. Then gives some background story you can't check like once been an in-house lawyer for an investment bank and I had extensive interactions with all three rating agencies. Then goes on to say that S&P analysts aren’t the sharpest tools in the drawer is a massive understatement. Yet he used them. Yet they are the big rich ratings agency listened to by governments and banks. One "finance" lawyer who for all we know is one of many on George Soros's payroll or even once worked for Burnie Madoff and now blogs on fiance while living off his savings because we know banker's lawyers get more in one year than average worker gets in 10 years and banker's lawyers can be trusted right?

Some Obama supporting lawyers say S&P are not smart enough to understand Obama arguments. I kid you not, this is a hard-constraint in their game-plan, constant insult, no substance. Have you heard all of Obama's plans. Have you ever heard how he going to cut debt? You should be aware the collapse of GM and others was due to debt right? GM was paying unions payroll benefits that far exceeded revenue from the sale of cars. Unions will have you believe it was executive bonus. Left-wing university elitists will have you think it was GM was selling "gas guzzlers". GM admits problem was the cars people wanted for the price people wanted to pay was not sustainable. That is right, people didn't want pay what it cost to make the car, let alone the pay for all the extras GM's unions where making in pension fund management, worker's health care insurance and employee bonus payments. This is how the left try to manipulate you into changing your ideas of good and bad. Attack anything a boss does, even when the employees are getting more than 35% of the revenue. Payroll is expected to be around 20% of a companies cost. Remember company has to pay tax, pay for raw materials and pay shareholders. Most big companies also have debt. Left will always try find some spin and leave out the contextual statements as "messy".

Insiders will tell you they personally seen S&P make far more basic mistakes than the one they made in miscalculating the US’s debt-to-GDP ratio. Yet S&P are the big brand agency and they are not. Same insiders who can tell you all these mistakes by S&P in the past are rather odd, because how come they keep using S&P? How comes they claim as bankers they constantly check for financial soundness, when these insiders are the ones who suppose to protecting YOUR deposits somehow these "insiders" didn't warn the big banks were insolvent? How comes not of these insiders who now claim S&P is so unstable didn't warn anyone about the banks been so unstable? I think it would been more important if these New York finance lawyers who "worked" in the industry for so long warned the people about Bernie Madoff, Enron, General Motors, Goldman Sachs and others.

Treasury has no right to be outraged, the people do. Treasury of the nation acting in the interests of a political party.  S&P only mistake was not proofing final draft, a mistake rarely made, but any mistake, even a comma out of place is pounced on by Democrats. Highlighting faults in others while refusing to even acknowledge anything less than resounding praise is common with the left. The left love to judge and hate to be judged by others (unless it is resounding praise).

So to S&P, I say: you have sounded the alarm that few dared in the past to ring.

The answer is go forward, not backwards. The left wants drag world back to the 1800s. Marx stole some quotes, he didn't even found the union movement. He just got good at been a bully and taking credit for others.

Progress should be made in better goods, not cheapest. Local grown food. Balanced budgets, not debt ridden government. Would you loan anyone who can't pay back? Then ask yourself why do BANKS want government to borrow more. Banks don't employ you, they employ those rich New York finances who tell you how bad the Republicans are and how you need vote Democrat. Democrats who borrow money from the banks.

Be a proud Christian, be a proud Patriot. Don't be beguiled into a one-party state under Obama. You think it will not happen. You think if Obama gets in second term he will not seek same as Hugo Chavez an alteration of the constitution to get more power and longer terms and another term. Obama already stated he need lot longer than one term, just for the few promises he actually made in his run up. Don't be fooled by Obama and the Democrats  Obama has actually told you he wants power and needs more time, he just minced words about it. He never talks plain and doesn't give details before he acts.

Amazing how many women suddenly didn't like Sarah Palin because of a few media comments about her cloths. Really a fundamental problem with people when looks more important than brains. You want a leader, not a model running the country. Not that I endorce anyone to run against Obama, but I rather a soccer mum than a university pot head.

Indoctrination in Schools, Even Maths Hijacked by Activists!

Those of us who attended government schools before “social justice” spread through the curriculum like the plague will probably remember maths class working through basic problems.

But according to those who call themselves progressives what we didn’t know it at that time was while we busily pondering combinations, probability and basic times tables that we were actually being taught to tacitly approve of exploitative capitalistic system.

So progressives want to change our all our text books, even maths. They (the university elitists) want to include so called social justice into maths, adding "problems" to get people to "solve" social justice issues, all the time blaming "the west".

One such example of "social justice" is the cocoa farms in Ivory Coast and child slavery. Now we in the west don't set the laws in the Ivory Coast. Ivory Coast is a member of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. If we didn't buy cocoa someone else will. Do you see China, North Korea, African Union, Iran or any Islamic state doing anything about slavery? Do you see the progressive media saying anything about human trafficking? If we didn't buy the cocoa, what then would the progressive say about poverty?

The politics of attacking the west is duality. If you buy, you are exploiting, if you don't buy your a racist and increasing poverty. It is exploitation of guilt.

The answer is to respond with the truth and ask the most basic question, why are you so full of hate?

There is no progress in the left. Left is about going backwards.

The left talks about "no one left behind", but all the left want to do is take from those who do and give to those who don't. Equality isn't natural. The weather isn't equal. Rain fall isn't equal. Some countries are bigger. Some people are smarter than others. Some people die sooner than others. People don't have the same likes, wants or even needs.

Christian charity is and always has been the shinning light. North Korea would starved to death if it wasn't for western aid, but they got thousands of workers who will lose thier home, job and go to jail if they tell people they relabel aid from America as aid from China or even put into North Korean sacks. Most of the western aid that goes to Africa is relabelled as "Islamic" to appease Islam, who then thanks the west by saying the West isn't giving enough aid as most of the "aid" comes from "Islamic states".

Stop doing as progressives tell you. They are not your friends. They don't wish you well. They don't tolerate you. It isn't what they say, it is what they do. They betray you, they betray their own country.

What has the left given Africa? War, poverty and death.

Be a Christian. Be a patriot. What can you do? Do what progressive do, but when YOU talk of social justice, talk of Jesus and his lessons. Talk of the Christian anti-slavery league. Talk of western aid. Lobby to have ALL western aid delivered by western aid agencies only. Stop the relabelling of western aid. Take an active roll. When that fanatically left wing says something about your beliefs, remind that intolerant person, that it is your right. Take notes to remind yourself who is a "progressive" and who is "real Christian".

If you want to know who are the real progressives are, they are Real Christians. Is why the west is so successful. Don't ignore history, learn from it. Don't back down, Jesus didn't.

Divided We Fall

There needs to be a dedicated and focused “united front” against those who are united in hate against Christians and Judeo/Christian traditions.

To me the pairing of religion and politics makes perfect sense. We call to God, we thank God and our freedoms are based on the belief that every man, woman and child’s liberty comes directly from God. Look around the world, without Judeo/Christian traditions, there is no liberty. Yet over the years, those calling themselves communists, marxists, socialists, humanists and "secularists" have constantly and without pause cast insult after insult. The left preaches tolerance, but in action is anything but.

You don't have to look far to see various diverse groups are (temporarily) united by their hatred of Western civilization, America and Israel been at the forefront of this, but overall all Judeo/Christian traditions. If ANY Christian group expressed hatred on the scale that is seen by anti-Christian groups, the ACLU, unions, femanists and every other "ism" will be calling them nazis and taking legal action under socalled anti-discimination laws.

One should not need a trumplet blast from heaven in order to recognize that Christians as a whole need to regroup and refocus in order to present a united front against this very real and dire threat. They don't seek to convert you, they target your children into gangs, into radical groups and generally subvert your authority. It started as the left moved freom unionist, to university radical to areas of "interest" such as social studies teachers, as well as "traditional" left wing movements such as law, journalism and science.

In America, this is more evident with the large number of "campus reds" who don't work, don't really study and are members of many student groups and collect pay checks from "causes". Yet If you are a non-union contractor you to disclose your political contributions, but not the Union members. Obama plans to do it by through an Executive Order. Just another piece of Obama's social justice that doesn't include you or me.

The foes we fight are clever, vicious, dedicated, and completely amoral, which are a formidable combination. Remember they are not after you, they are in the schools and media constantly grooming children to radicalise, to be violent, to take drugs, to be anti-family and anti-christian. They have been ceaselessly undermining and subverting Christianity from both within and without. Every time a Union member is arrested, especially a school teacher, the Union gets supression order and covers it up under presumption of innocence, right to privacy and so on. Not so when any clergy is arrested. Now remember, the clergy member who did wrong, joined Chruch not for belief, but to asbuse position of trust. Media never puts things in perspective. How many lawyers know that they have a quilty client, but seek to get them off, knowing thier client is a criminal and will committ crimes again? How many school teachers are "shifted" and fired, but never disclosed as sex offender? How come their is social tolerance of professors who sleep with thier barely legal students? Why the coverup over Clinton's affairs with college girls (were they all over 18?). You don't know because the law is sellective. The media is selective.

You can start by looking at who you associate with. What you children are learning. Take interest in your children, all of them. Talk to them. All relationships are based on understanding. Don't assume, talk and tell and then listen. Don't talk for 30 minutes on dangers of drugs and leave it at that. Children are curious, if you don't know, don't make it up. Go with them to library or Internet. Remember pro-drug groups pay for studies, so make sure you not been duped with false information. Remember marijuana's popularity is because of the constant and unrelenting media (especially popular films) push that "pot" is harmless. Tobacco was "harmless". Cocaine was called harmless. Heroine was marketed legally as "safe". It started with small time disobience to see if they (the socialist group) has influence, once they influence the child, it starts with social inclusion to "parties' and events "away" from "uncool" parents. Socialists use grooming practices that you would associate with paedophilia. In fact most of these groups preach social immorality. Look at the "sex" revolution in the 1960s. Radicalising children, getting them to be violent, anti-family and sexually permissive then introducing them to hardcore drugs and turning young girls into prostitutes and even some went as far as turning kids into killers. Because socialists have the legal profession, particularly in America the ACLU, they enjoy protection.

ACLU associates itself not only with university marxists groups and environmental radicals, but a pedophile group known as many names including MANBOY. A sick group that wants age of consent for homosexual activities to be lowered to include pre-teen boys. Some even try use religion, claims God made them that way. The gay gene is another excuse. All this keeps society divided and on the defensive because Christians been forced under so called anti-discrimination laws to accept homosexuality. Despite constant warnings about the invalidity of the The Kinsey Reports, Truman and the democrats, along with the left wing intellectuals used these to "inflict" social change. KKK and other radical groups who were doing the bidding of the Democrats suddenly found themselves in conflict with the party that founded them and supported them since end of the civil war.

Example Robert Carlyle Byrd, who served as a U.S. Representative from 1953 until 1959 and as a U.S. Senator from 1959 to 2010. Was a member of the KKK for long time, but as Clinton put it, a brief association and he later changed his views and denounced racial intolerance. Byrd only knows for sure and he took that the his grave what he truely believed in. But he lectured often to youth to get them into politics and follow the "Democrats". What ever the party believes isn't what that party says. They all over the map. Are they racists? Are they upholding Christian values. KKK wasn't much to do with killing, but low level terrorism to get minority groups to vote Democrat and to oppress anyone who spoke out against Democrat policy of segregation, exploitation of minorities in employment and abuse of the minimum wage system, also credit exploitation where banks and Democrat businesses would deny credit to minorities. Yet activities by the KKK (as well as vote rigging) was used by the Kennedy clan to get into office.

Then all this KKK activity was put onto Christians as a whole. Branded right wing extremists. Many groups now praise Democrats as "saviours" of minority groups from persecution. Yet the civil rights bill was President  Dwight D. Eisenhower. John and Robert Kennedy opposed this bill. They don't even credit Ike with his victories in WW2, let alone civil rights bill, nor mention he founded NASA. Nor did they credit Ike with economic prosperity. Democrats engineered civil unrest using the KKK then got into power by telling KKK Democrats support them, telling minorities only Democrats can stand up to the KKK. Thus new era of Christian bashing had began. Kennedy once in office despite illegal activities is praised. This show you how far the media has devolved from independent voice of the people, peeking in 1940s, down to a left wing propaganda machine. How? because people assume. Never assume you know what a politican really stands for.

Long term fix is a party with Christian values and a willingness to expell anyone who steps off the platform. People voted for too long for left wing parties in the West because it what they told to do by the unions. Not just America, UK, Australia, Europe, Russia. The unions demand its members be left wing and vote for the left.

But left-right, these are distinctions invented by the left. Used to mean two sections of the socialists movement, left been the Marxist radicals and the right been the intellectuals. Later the get left wing views into mainstream, the left called themselves socialists under Lenin and Ho Chi Minh in Paris. Declaring the right to be "others", that others are the enemy.

Socialists lie. So don't beleive what people say, but what they do. Who they support. Remember a Democrat will talk tolerance to your face, because your the enemy and an adult. Behind your back they say mild slights against you. Turn everyone, every try turning your kids against you for been "conservative".

Altering language is what socialists do. They talk of tolerance, but they only mean do what your told. They talk of liberalism, but really mean marxism. Nothing to do with liberal tolerance, marxism doesn't tolerate anything that isn't marxism and the worship of Karl Marx.

While you can't force people to see the truth, you must not give in just because your opponent will not. What matters is if you give into your children, you will lose them. Marxists win by recruiting the youth into radical groups. Environmentalism is one of and most common cause today that marxists use to recruit kids. But they still use soft drugs and parties like they did in the 1960s. Another cause marxists use is poverty, Africa, Israel and in general war.

Remember marxists are not anti-war, they are against anyone opposing them. FARC, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea all call themselves freedom fighters. Say what you believe and it gets you killed. It isn't what marxism says, it is what they do. University students are radicalised because they easy lead astray because in school they already been undermined with history lessons talking of glorious revolts and liberations from oppression. Nothing on the rape, murder and torture used by so called liberators to create "zones of operation".

So start today with your children. Be more careful who you let into your home. Teach your children to be aware what grooming is. Stranger danger awareness is not enough. Predators come as your friend. Radicals will pose as peaceful. Union organisers can't be trusted, they get paid to keep people in the union. Teachers can't be trusted, they been brain washed into thinking they saving children.

Remember criminal elements are often patient. They will pose as nice, honest and even don't swear around the parents. Not all predictors abuse kids sexually. They recruit teens with drugs and alcohol. Or start with "radical causes".

If you don't take interest in your wife, husband, son, daughter, brother or sister. Predators will. Predators take  many forms, the bully, a gang, a drug dealer, sexual abuse. Most teens are abused sexually by other teens, usually ones slightly older. Only later do the "adult" predators move in.

Climate Change Scam.

Every good scam has some truth to it. Every season isn't the same. Some days are hotter and colder than others, some winters longer than others.

So lets start with the truths. Polar ice is melting, no denying that. So don't deny climate change but understand that Climate has ALWAYS been in change and the recent changes were known, expected and been exploited by "university elitists".

But not all truths of climate science is been told. Have you ever had a weather prediction from the day before be right? How about long term predictions be right? Not often right?

Ever heard of the solar cycle? Did you know sun's output isn't constant? That is has a cycle? The solar variation causes some weather and climate on Earth. The cycle is observed by counting the frequency and placement of sunspots visible on the Sun. Weather been what we see daily and climate been the over all seasons. This solar cycle has been observed and studied for over 100 years.

UV impact is been ignored. No one wants admit the failure over hole in ozone from CFCs. This UV is what is melting the ice and why record snow falls lead to record floods. Nothing to do with CO2.

CO2 is natural. Did you know it the O2 levels too high, you die just as easy if they too low.

We always been in a greenhouse, without the greenhouse effect the planet would be deadly cold.

I show you climate change is been around since the beginning of Earth itself. How many ice ages we had? Wasn't the world hotter and more tropical (as shown from fossils) when dinosaurs roamed?

Didn't the ice cover most of the world? Wasn't there fossils that show Antarctica once had forests?

So really isn't Climate Change real and natural? Sure I want polution controlled.

But behind the climate change by green peace and the green party is socialism.

Here is list of "questions" asked by The Greens on climate change:

• Do you agree or disagree with the following?
• If people work hard, they almost always get what they want?
• Laws of nature are responsible for differences in wealth in society?
• It is virtually impossible to eliminate poverty?
• Most people who don't get ahead in our society should not blame the system, they have only themselves to blame?
• Social class differences reflect differences in the natural order of things?
• There will always be poor people, because there will never be enough jobs for everybody?
• If people wanted to change the economic system to make things equal, they could?
• It is unfair to have an economic system which produces extreme wealth and extreme poverty at the same time?
• There are no inherent differences between rich and poor, it is purely a matter of the circumstances into which you are born?
• Our customs and national heritage are the things that have made us great, and certain people should be made to show greater respect for them?
• Our prisons are a shocking disgrace. Criminals are unfortunate people who deserve much better care, instead of so much punishment?
• Obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues children should learn?
• Organisations like the army have a pretty unhealthy effect upon men because they require strict obedience of commands from supervisors.
• The courts are right in being easy on drug offenders. Punishment would not do any good in cases like these?
• Being kind to bludgers or criminals will only encourage them to take advantage of your weakness, so it's best to use a firm, tough hand when dealing with them?
• Realistically, nothing will be done about climate change until it's too late?
• The impacts of climate change on people's lives are huge?
• I think climate change will affect me personally?
• The impacts of climate change are really beyond my control?
• Climate change may mean that wealth and resources end up being distributed more fairly?
• Doing something about climate change is an opportunity to be part of something bigger than ourselves?
• I have stopped listening to people go on about climate change because I am tired of hearing about the topic?
• Individuals can make a difference to climate change?
• I feel it is my ethical responsibility to change my individual behaviour to combat climate change?
• The thought of climate change scares me?
• Climate change will foster greater community spirit and connectedness?
• The impacts of climate change are inevitable now so there's not much point worrying about it?
• I don't have the information I need to reduce the impact of climate change?
• Climate change will result in financial hardship for many people?
• Responding to climate change will cost a lot of money?
• There's nothing we can do about climate change that will make a meaningful difference?
• There are meaningful things I can do to reduce the impact of climate change?
• Individuals working together can make a difference to climate change ?
• People should be accountable to the whole of society for their behaviours?
• I don't like being morally judged for my private behaviours ?
• I don't have enough money to do things that would reduce the impact of climate change?
• Attempting to respond to climate change will cost the country too much money?
• I don't have enough time to do things that would reduce the impact of climate change?
• I try not to think about climate change?
• Trying to do something about climate change will mean a lot of people lose their jobs?
• The whole climate change issue could turn out to be one gigantic mistake by scientists ?
• I feel a moral duty to do something about climate change?
• The challenge of climate change will provide people with a sense of purpose?
• The existence of widespread economic differences does not mean that they are inevitable?
• There are many reasons to think that the economic system is unfair?
• Poor people are not essentially different from rich people?
• Equal distribution of resources is a possibility for our society?
• Economic differences in the society reflect an illegitimate distribution of resources?
• Economic positions are legitimate reflections of people's achievements?
• Equal distribution of resources is unnatural?
• There is no point in trying to make incomes more equal?

Most of these questions have nothing to do with climate, climate change or if it natural, man-made or can be changed or how to go about it.

No one is equal to another. Are we going to alter smart people so they are not smarter than the "slowest". Some people are taller, going to alter them? Some people are beautiful, going change them so they don't look more beautiful than another? Some can run faster, some can't run but can swim faster. Some can juggle, some are left handed, some can see better than others. Some people can't see, going make everyone blind? Not everyone likes the same sports. So if only 500 people go see women's football play, going to force the men's team to only have 500 tickets sold? Why take money from successful sports to support those that are not?

Equality was ment for and only for law. Well we saw how well the Democrats stuck to that. They still are not equal in the law. Making special laws to protect minorities is discrimination and still unconstitutional. Besides Jesus tried to teach us not to fight evil with evil.

Can't fight climate change with money, with rhetoric about wealth. Wealth didn't melt the ice, UV did that. If climate change was going make all these new green jobs and green industry, Al Gore would spent his $400m in ill-gotten gains on solar panels and not invest in Apple making iPods and iPhones using conflict minerals from Africa in China.

London Burning.

As we enter the third day of left wing terrorism in London, I can't help notice the usual tripe from the media about social problems and putting the blame onto others. This is violence for political sake. It is to drive out peaceful residence who are not part of the anti-Christian, anti-social culture of parent-less drug youth. The riots are not random. They using mobile phones, getting outside information, spotters telling them where police are. This is an organised terrorist act by nameless groups.

But the left wing media will have you believe it is random. It is inspired by the shooting of a youth. But it is not about that. They targeting stores, looting from middle class hard-working people. Burning cars belonging to ordinary citizens who only committed no crime.

The left talk about poverty and long term unemployment and lack of opportunity. But these are kids. Some young as 11. They not motived by joblessness, they are a mob following the leader. Filled with sense of entitlement constantly drummed into them by combination of marxism, drug culture, violent video games, lax parents, anti-Christian and anti-family politics from the left.

The guardian will have you believe it is the new governments fault. The government didn't shoot someone. A group of police did. The TV plays some video from anarchists claiming it is about police having too much power. But really do you believe someone hiding their face and committing crimes using excuses they heard from a socialist website? You think children buy into the politics or just like the offer of drugs, alcohol, looting and setting fires to live out the fantasy life portrayed in ultraviolent games and backed by older thugs looking to push a political agenda and excuse by socialist media looking to drag society down into the gutter.

Kids are too young to understand. The rioters would not like it if someone entered thier room, broke stuff, burnt their stuff or stole their stuff. But these kids are not raised with respect or learnt to respect others. Nor does the media blame the criminality on the kids, the university elitists who excuse it. Labor looking to recover lost support are going to side with the mob. So can't expect Brittish opposition party(s) to be onside with government. Nor with the police.

The police are not to blame. They doing their job. Faced with a culture of drugs, handguns and defiance. Criminals are encouraged by their fellow criminals to defy police, to make trouble. The left, especially drug dealers encourage criminality and violence to create "lawless zones" so they (the drug dealers) can exploit the weak, the poor and the addicted. Drugs been so highly addictive.

Poor is not excuse to commit crime. Majority of poor, majority of people are peaceful. The problem is with the culture of unions, lawyers, media and even teachers making excuses for what is a brat. Cure is discipline. More not less police. Teen punks need to learn a lesson. But so do the instigators and organisers. The intellectuals encouraging, preaching and coordinating "anarchy operations" should get jailed for criminal conspiracy and be held to account for damage.

One of the reasons why insurance is so high and businesses finding it so hard is the damage done by these punks. The reason why youth unemployment so high for so long, the long term labor party who did nothing but borrow lots. Then tell these kids the reason why the end to free money that they somehow entitled to is rich not paying enough tax. Well kids too lazy to learn and already full of entitlement are not going to check facts, not going ask their disinterested parents or read the newspapers which just going tell them blame to banks.

Answer is easy to say, hard to do. Discipline. Not only the youth, but the parents. Governments can't keep borrowing. The left wing intellectuals need to be held to account for lighting the fire, the left policy is recruit youth, radicalise them and turn them into rioters. The youth so filled with sense of entitlement feel it is funny, they get a sense of power from stealing. But so short term, short sighted are these youth, so willing to be pawns, don't see the future. Who wants hire them, they can't be trusted. They tell lies, resort to violence. So much for the peaceful left.

These kids lack Christian values. The unions not giving them moral guidance. The left wing media isn't giving them a future. The university elitists not going to give them jobs or medical care. The people sending the text messages don't want them to be happy and employed. Drug dealers don't care you can't afford your next fix or who you steal from (as long as it not them). Nor care someone stole from you (unless it was their stash).

You think the marxists if they got into power would tolerate these youth? They just useful idiots to use a marxist term.

The left says go soft, but going soft is what these kids deep down don't want. Going soft will not win respect, not break up the mob. Nor is sending in the dogs blindly. Break up the mob. Shut down mobiles in riot areas. Hard on the ring leaders. Break up the left wing cells. Jail the intellectuals behind the riots.